Logistic Multi-height Designs Predicting Probability of Experience Intrapersonal Consequences off Sex of the Gender, Connection with Companion and use regarding Contraceptive

Logistic Multi-height Designs Predicting Probability of Experience Intrapersonal Consequences off Sex of the Gender, Connection with Companion and use regarding Contraceptive

Note. Due to brief variations in shed research round the each kind regarding impacts, Top step 1 Letter selections regarding 657 to help you 664 people weeks. Peak 2 Letter range out of= 203 in order to 205 some one. OR=Chance Proportion. CI=Believe Period.

Dining table 5

Logistic Multiple-height Designs Predicting Probability of Sense Social Outcomes from Gender from the Intercourse, Reference to Lover and use out-of Birth control

Note. On account of short differences in missing studies around the each type regarding results, Top 1 Letter ranges from 657 so you can 664 people months. Peak 2 Letter ranges from= 203 so you’re able to 205 individuals. OR=Chances Proportion. CI=Confidence Period.

Point dos: Gender variations in intrapersonal consequences

We predicted that male students would have greater odds of experiencing positive and lesser odds of experiencing negative intrapersonal consequences of sex than female students ( Table 4 ; ?01). We found no gender differences in positive intrapersonal consequences, but found differences in two negative consequences: worry about health and dissatisfaction. Male students had greater odds of worrying about a health consequence than female students, although this association differed depending on relationship status (see Aim 4). Male students also had 60% lesser odds of experiencing dissatisfaction. Thus, our predictions were partially supported for negative, but not positive, intrapersonal consequences.

Aim step 3: Gender variations in social consequences

We predicted that male students would have lesser odds of experiencing positive and negative interpersonal consequences than female students ( Table 5 ; ?01). Gender differences in interpersonal consequences were non-significant, with one exception, in the opposite direction of our hypothesis. Male students had two times greater odds of reporting partner approval. Therefore, we found no support for our predictions in Aim 3.

Point 4: Dating status

We predicted that students would have lesser odds of reporting positive and greater odds of reporting negative consequences on days they had sex with a non-dating as opposed to a dating partner ( Tables 4 and ? and5; 5 ; ?ten), and that this association would be stronger for female students compared to male students (?11). Students were not less likely to report any positive consequences when they had sex with a non-dating, as opposed to dating, partner. However, we found two differences in reporting negative consequences. Students had nearly three times greater odds of reporting feeling guilty on days they had sex with a non-dating, compared to a dating, partner. Students also had almost eight times greater odds of feeling they had not been ready for sex on days they had sex with a non-dating partner. With regard to gender differences in the effect of relationship with sexual partner, we found two significant differences. Male students were about 60% less likely to experience the intrapersonal consequence of self-affirmation after sex with a non-dating, as compared to a dating, partner (the product of odds for females and the gender interaction, ?10 ? ?11), whereas this association was not significant for female students. In addition, female students had almost three times greater odds of worrying about their health when they had sex with a non-dating, as opposed to a dating, partner; in contrast, male students had about 50% lesser odds of worrying about health after sex with a non-dating partner compared to sex with a dating partner. In sum, results supported predictions of Aim 4 for some negative, but no positive, consequences.

Point 5: Non-entry to birth prevention

We predicted that students would have lesser odds of experiencing positive consequences and greater odds of experiencing negative consequences on days they did not use contraception compared to days they did ( Tables 4 and ? and5; 5 ; ?20), and that this association would be stronger for female, as compared to male, students (?21). We found differences for two negative intrapersonal consequences (health and guilt), but no differences in the odds of experiencing positive intrapersonal or any interpersonal consequences. Students who did not use contraception had nearly four times greater odds of worrying about health and two times greater odds of feeling guilty than students who used contraception. We found no significant gender differences in these associations. Thus, predictions of Aim 5 were partially supported, as non-use of contraception predicted some negative, but no positive, consequences.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *